Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance
نویسندگان
چکیده
149 Received January 25, 2016; Accepted February 8, 2016; Epub February 11, 2016; http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1601251 t4 report* Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) Guidance Nicholas Ball 1§, Mark T. D. Cronin 2§, Jie Shen 3§, Karen Blackburn 4, Ewan D. Booth 5, Mounir Bouhifd 6, Elizabeth Donley 7, Laura Egnash 7, Charles Hastings 8, Daland R. Juberg 1, Andre Kleensang 6, Nicole Kleinstreuer 9, E. Dinant Kroese 10, Adam C. Lee 11, Thomas Luechtefeld 6, Alexandra Maertens 6, Sue Marty 1, Jorge M. Naciff 4, Jessica Palmer 7, David Pamies 6, Mike Penman 12, Andrea-Nicole Richarz 2, Daniel P. Russo 13, Sharon B. Stuard 4, Grace Patlewicz 14, Bennard van Ravenzwaay 10, Shengde Wu 4, Hao Zhu 13 and Thomas Hartung 6,15 1The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA and Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 2School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; 3Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA; 4The Procter and Gamble Co., Cincinnati, OH, USA; 5Syngenta Ltd, Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK; 6Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Baltimore, MD, USA; 7Stemina Biomarker Discovery Inc., Madison, WI, USA; 8BASF SE, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany and Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 9National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 10Risk Analysis for Products in Development, TNO Zeist, Zeist, The Netherlands; 11DuPont Haskell Global Centers for Health and Environmental Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA; 12Penman Consulting, Brussels, Belgium; 13Department of Chemistry and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA; 14US EPA/ORD, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 15University of Konstanz, CAAT-Europe, Konstanz, Germany
منابع مشابه
t4 report*: Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) Guidance
Grouping of substances and utilizing read-across of data within those groups represents an important data gap filling technique for chemical safety assessments. Categories/analogue groups are typically developed based on structural similarity and, increasingly often, also on mechanistic (biological) similarity. While read-across can play a key role in complying with legislations such as the Eur...
متن کاملSupporting read-across using biological data.
Read-across, i.e. filling toxicological data gaps by relating to similar chemicals, for which test data are available, is usually done based on chemical similarity. Besides structure and physico-chemical properties, however, biological similarity based on biological data adds extra strength to this process. In the context of developing Good Read-Across Practice guidance, a number of case studie...
متن کاملSelf-Assessment of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care: Self-Reported Practice Using the TARGET Primary Care Self-Assessment Tool
Multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions including: antibiotic guidance, reviews of antibiotic use using audits, education, patient facing materials, and self-assessment, are successful in improving antimicrobial use. We aimed to measure the self-reported AMS activity of staff completing a self-assessment tool (SAT). The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP)/Public Hea...
متن کاملOpenness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour (GMC guideline).
3 This guidance complements the joint statement from the healthcare regulators and gives more information about how to follow the principles set out in Good medical practice2 and The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives.3 Appendix 1 sets out relevant extracts from General Medical Council (GMC) and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) guidance. This guida...
متن کامل